3.30.2024

Logic must prevail captain

 Firstly,it’s years since I wrote anything,so just let you know: I’m still here.

The title might be remembered by fans of Star Trek The Original Series where Mr. Spock drove everybody nuts with his logic.

But…

Torah IS logic.

The Hebrew language IS logic.

Four years ago,governments tried to implement a plandemic,all about control and their psychopathic desires for a one World Government;not the first time.

Today,Israel is fighting another Amalek,this time Hamas,who according to their charter will not stop until Israel and Jews cease to exist.

All is being revealed.

People are seeing Islam for what it really is: an ideology of conquest and hatred of everything non-Islamic(especially Jews and Israel) masquerading as a religion(of peace).

Christianity is pagan,an assumed faith that began in 135  CE.

Every doctrine,tenet and tradition came from pagan sources

*Constantine instituted rest on the venerable day of the Sun in 313 CE.

*E*ster is the Roman fertility godess festival (along with the Babylonian egg laying rabbit),brought onto the Church of Rome in 336 CE to bring more pagans and money into the church.


Same with Xmas and the other feasts,but….like Columbus discovering America in 1492(the Vikings were here first in 900 CE and somebody was there anyway),but the The Vartican controlled history and most are so brainwashed that they won’t listen and won’t research either,they just argue.

Judaism is true and the real rabbi from Nazareth taught Torah and lived and interacted in the Jewish community.


Back later.




3.29.2015

CNN Program "Finding Jesus" Full Of Suppositions

Tonight,I tried to watch this series of programs on CNN to see if I could learn something new to add to what I have learned over the years,through realizing that the Greek and Hebrew/Aramaic terms for some things appear to mean the same in English,but,at the root they don't,example:

       "Christ" and "Mashiach."

Although they both mean "anointed one" in English,the latter refers exclusively to the messiah in Tanakh,while the former refers just like the name "Jesus(from Latin: "Iesus",Greek: "Isous",short form of "Iesous" "healer of Zeus"),refers to Greek pagan deities.

*Doesn't anybody wonder about the fact that when the Romans invaded Jerusalem and built their city Aelia Capitolina" on top of the ruins and erected their sun-deity image,they named after their deities,and the abbrevation is: "IHS" -it's on EVERY church banner -and it doesn't mean what they think it means!!!

The other problem is the fact that Eusebius,the early extant church historian(260-340 C.E.),stated in his Ecclesiastical  History that The Rabbi From Nazareth was known by the title of Ribi Yehoshua,and.more that after his death,the charge over his Netzarim talmidim was given over to his brother "Ya'acov HaTzaddik",hellenized to "James The Just."

When you also realize that in Judaism,according to Devarim(hellenized to Deuteronomy)13:2-6,no Jew,especially a Rabbi would ever have said the Torah was done away with,much less declare himself "the son of G-d",you realize that any logically thinking scholar  must ask the following questions:


  • What does Orthodox Judaism believe?
  • What is the Hebrew/Aramaic meaning of....?
  • What was the political situation?
  • What do later historians write?
  • Any there any documented clues in the regards to these first century events?
  • Is the New Testament(displacement theology term invented by Marcian!) genuine,or redacted?

Anyway...when the narrator reads the names on the ossuary,he keeps saying " James the brother of Jesus",I kept yelling "That's not what it says,dummy!You can't read!"It says: "Ya'acov Bar Yosef...."

I don't see anything wrong with Anglicization,but,it is always best to preserve the original language terms when dealing with certain subjects,but,one should also make sure that the Anglicized name DOES equal the linguistic term in that language.In this case,they don't!

This is what I mean by supposition. On all these programs,they have "professors",etc,from Christian backgrounds,rabbiting the same regurgitated stuff,never bothering to check their sources.

In other fields,if experts did this,they'd get themselves in a lot of trouble,but,in religion it's allowed,because like Columbus' discovery of America being pre dated by the Vikings,there's no sense changing history because nobody cares anyway,and,because "religion is big business(for Israel)" and money,support and votes count!

After a while it got so bad I turned it off.

May the truth be told -yet!



12.19.2012

First Priority:Conform To Torah

Over the last few days I have  had a few emails from someone with a hard luck story to tell(not that I am down on this person in any way)and it's tough without knowing all the facts,just what to say.

But this much is certain:

Each Seeker of Truth must realize that the first priority isn't conversion,it's reorientation(to Torah)!

If you are coming from a Christian,or other Pagan background,or even coming back to being an Observant-Jew,the first task is:

  • Conforming to Torah and Orthodox-Jewish Halachah
The second task is(this could actually be the first,but,no matter,let it stand):

  • Deciding not to follow after your own Eyes and Heart.
 The third task is:
  •  Rinse and Repeat the Cycle to Perfection!
At some point,in the future,it may be possible to convert to Judaism,but,especially if it would put you in a mixed marriage(a marriage between a Jew and a non-Jew,which is forbidden in the Torah),it can not be done,in which case,you will have to live as a 'righteous non-Jew'.


12.18.2012

Profile Changed Because Of Spam

I've had to change my profile because of possible spam.

  • I changed the website to redirect posters to: http://www.netzarim.co.il
  •  I removed my MSN ID from my Blogger Profile,which I shouldn't have entered in the first place.So far,I've only had 2 questionable emails,both from women(why always women and why me?) with a sob story,confused about how to be a Netzarim and convert to Judaism,etc,and,of course,with a tale to tell.which.may,or,may not be true,seeing as the email addresses are interesting,to say the least.
  • Want to make contact?Leave a comment,or sign up as a 'friend.'

7.27.2012

The Christian Church And Dragnet

If you are old enough to remember watching Dragnet,that popular Crime Drama from way back in the 1950s-1970s,you'll remember that Sergeant Friday(Jack Webb) always opened the program with: "The story you are about to hear is true,but the names have been changed to protect the innocent...."



Well,the old Looney Tunes had a parody of Dragnet,with Daffy Duck playing "Detective Duck Drake",where he opens the cartoon with: "The story you are about to hear is true,but the names have been changed to protect the guilty(he raises his voice at this point and spits the italicized part out in contempt!)."


At this point,you must be thinking: "Well,how is the Church involved and how and where is the relationship between it and Dragnet?"

It's purely symbolic!

Firstly,Daffy Duck's line is closer to the truth(in this case),than the original Dragnet line,in that if I had entitled this article differently,it would have been:

Operation Ecclesiastical Cover up Exposed!

What better way to discredit the Jews as a people than to paint them as the bad guys and erase all evidence of their history,twist it,contaminate it and claim it as your own -knowing that::
  • you have the power in Europe;nobody would dare to challenge you,or they and their country will be 'under an edict','declared anathema[under a curse]' ,etc.
  • Keep the Bible only in Latin,chained to the pulpit
  • Make sure that the common people stay illiterate and unlearned ,so they can't read it
  • Make  them too jaded and lazy to make the effort anyway

But.....there are always a few who will -because they have to know...for sure!

 Some,well meaning 'Simpletons' consider it 'a lack of faith' to question and look for evidence.Their motto is: "I believe the Bible and that's good enough for me."That's a whole article in itself,so I don't time to explore that one,but the truth is(especially in this day and age),all the background material you can come up with,so much the better,and many people,especially educated people,will respect you a lot more.

To put it another way: Columbus discovered America in 1492...(the same year the Jews were kicked out of Spain....Is there a relationship there,or is that just coincidence?),or did he?

Firstly,how do you discover a land that already has somebody there[read about the Caribe and other Indians and what Columbus' Spanish Conquistadors did to them[mind you,all Indian tribes had a history of oppressing each other in the same way],and on top of all that,my question is how did Roman Catholicism fit into all this?

Archaeologists say the the Vikings were actually here first,as early as 900 C.E,but some people have so accepted the well taught account that they would say: "What's the point of changing all the history books?"

Of course,if history was like George Orwell's '1984',one would just go back and 'edit' the past articles to say anything they want. His job was to 'edit' past archives of the Newspaper to agree with whatever 'those in power' were saying at the time!

I remember back in the fall of 1981,or maybe it was early 1982,when I met this guy from Jews For Jesus on the street in downtown Toronto.What he said really got me thinking and realizing: "Aha!Now,I'm onto something,except,I don't know what,or how to go about finding it out..."

He said: 'You have to remember that we Jews have been the victims of nearly 2,000 years of Ecclesiastical history and bad Bible translations,and in any case,his name wasn't Jesus,it was Yeshua."

So,I realized that like any good Reporter,I was going to have to do some deep digging to get to the bottom of this story and Watergate had nothing on this one!

Over the years,I continued to listen to various "Messianic Jews(they're 'christians',not because they believe "The Rabbi From Nazareth" is the Mashiach,but because,like the Church,they deify him and add Xtn doctrines,such as 'original sin(invented by Athanasius of Alexandria,apparently)",and "Vicarious Atonement(ca. 200 C.E. plus)" -all Greek and pagan  in their origin! )" explain and explore the "Jewish background" and "Jewish understanding" and Judaism" behind the 'story."

Each time,I came away with the thought "Something is wrong with this story and just isn't adding up!"

Suffice to say(as I found out 15 years later through The Seventh Day Adventist Church),there is nowhere in the N.T. where it says "the Law is done away with" and nowhere did "The Rabbi From Nazareth,his disciples,or Paul The Apostate,ever give any authorization for keeping Sun-g-d-day holy.

Where did they come from?

Constantine(cf. Daniel 7:25) and The Hellenist-Roman Church,aka Papal-Rome!

cf. Daniel chapter 2 and 7....re: Daniel's Fourth Beast -'an egg-laying Dragon.

In other words,Pagan Rome gave birth to,or morphed(changed shape and form,that is)into 'Papal Rome.'

Europe and the governments of the World,particularly,the western world ie:Europe,Canada,USA,Mexico,Central and South America,Australia and all the other former British Commonwealth Nations and the U.N. are the continuation and extension of that original pagan Roman Power ('Edom' ,'Esau')which would love to get rid of the Jews and Israel('Jacob') helped by Esau's descendents -Ishmael(the Arabs and Islam).

  • Witness the fact that it was the Emperor Hadrian who renamed the area of Judah/Judea and Samaria as 'Palestina."
  • Christianity started in 135 C.E.(not before)when the Romans deposed the 15th Netzarim Paqid Yehudah HaTzaddik and DISPLACED him with their own Roman gentile bishop 'Marcus' and thus began the mix of Babylonian/Egyptian/Greco/Roman pagan sun-g-d worship religion with Hellenized Judaism(Greek speaking Jews),the rise of the "Hellenist-Roman counterfeit man-g-d image" Jesus and the war against the Jews -which contines to this day.
  • In 1917,the Balfour Declaration,took land from the Ottoman Turks and doled it out to create the current Middle east map.Only 25% of that land was given to Israel,and yet,the U.N. and the other world powers(can you say 'Oil?'),since 1948 continuely press Israel into giving away land,which doesn't help because the Arabs('Palestinian' is a political label that never existed before 1948 -and the Arabs created that problem anyway)are never satisfied and have only one goal(like Hitler's): 'No more Jews,no more Israel,and Jerusalem -all ours!"
This weekend is Tisha B'Av -look it up and you'll find out that every major calamity from the destruction of the Beit HaMiqdash HaSheni(hellenized to 'Second Temple'),to the Second World War and the Shoah("Holocaust")...happened on the 9th of Av.


To make this article shorter and to get all the details of the real 1st-4th century history just go here:


Click: Christian Upgrade

Then go to the "History Museum" and read 'left to right",but you may want to read "Orthodox Judaism" and "Salvation" first.


In any event,what you will find is a very different history than the common western Ecclesiastical History('Christianity is an assumed faith').




4.02.2012

Christianity's Pagan Roots Exposed

Christians(and even many Jews) believe('assume' is a better word)that Christianity dates back to the first century,started by 'The Rabbi From Nazareth(now,that really makes sense.')'yet the facts prove otherwise.

Why is it that so few Christians consider how Christianity and Judaism are 180 degrees different?

Christianity claims descent from Judaism -is that true?Is there documented proof?

  • There are thousands of variations in the Greek New Testament manuscripts and fragments.In fact,according to The Interpreter's Dictionary Of The Bible,there are 30,000 plus variations in the Gospel of Luke alone!
  • There are no Greek(or Aramaic)N.T. manuscript sources pre-3rd century.
  • It was the early church father and heretic Marcion who invented the terms Old and New Testament,which obviously lent  'authority' to the Hellenist-Roman church's agenda towards the Jews,namely: "Displacement Theology.'ie:the church and its people have replaced the Jews as 'the people of G-d.'
  • Eusebius(260-340) documented (EH III.xxvii.4-6) that the original Netzarim accepted only the Jewish Tana"kh as Bible and only The Netzarim ("their own") Hebrew Matityahu (NHM) as an authentic account of the life and teachings of Ribi Yәhoshua, never accepting the 2nd-4th century, heavily gentile-redacted (Greek), NT.
  • There is no historical connection between the post 135 C.E.,2nd-4th century Hellenist-Roman counterfeit man-g-d image and the real first century Rabbi,who Eusebius says was known by the title of "Ribi Yehoshua",the 'Ribi' identifying him as a Pharisee Rabbi.
  • There was no "J' in  any language until after 500 C.E..The name J-e-s-u-s and C-h-r-i-s-t  both derive from Greek pagan terms rerferring to Greek Deities -which no self-respecting Jew would ever be associated with.
  • He also stated that the Netzarim  excised Saul/Paul as an apostate from Torah and rejected his writings.
  • Eusebius said that Christianity began in 135 C.E. when the Romans deposed the 15th Netzarim Jewish Paqid,or leader,Yehudah HaTzaddik and displaced him with their own gentile Bishop Marcus...
  • He admits that the Pope fabricated a line of Popes going back to Peter(actually the church`s `Peter`doesn`t bare any resemblance to `Shimon Bar Yonah,aka: `Keifah`)...Not only that,but the Hellenist-Roman Church back-invented a first century history - which  there is NO documentation for.
Just a little logic goes a long way.

For example,what was the makeup of first century Israel( the name 'Palestina' is post 135 C.E.)?

Its central theme was Judaism(of course,it wasn't called Judaism back  then.That term came about much later)),which consisted of  Torah,Tanakh ,etc in the Hebrew and Aramaic languages.

Therefore,one must look at first century events in the context that they took place in.When one does that,it will be quickly seen that many of Christianity's doctrines,things the N.T. quotes "The Rabbi From Nazareth" as saying,are heavily-redacted('back-editted')and just don't add up.

In fact,the truth is,not only was there no Christianity before 135 C.E.,but every Christian Symbol,Sign,Doctrine,Teaching,Belief -whatever can ONLY be traced to pagan sources,ie: Babylonian Religion,Egyptian Religion,Mthraism and other similar sources.

Which will it be for you?

Will it be:

  • Torah and Tanakh -or the N.T. and Displacement Theology?
  • Daniel's 4th Beast -Pagan/Papal Rome and its 'little horn power' Constantine who 'changed times and laws(meaning 'the Moedim[feasts] and Torah')' or Torah?
  • Ribi Yehoshua/Yeshua,or "J-e-s-u-s/Yeshu?"
  • Passover,or the Roman Fertility g-ddess festival of E-a-s-t-e-r?
  • Hannuchah" or the Norse/Roman festivals that eventually became known as "C-h-r-i-s-t-m-a-s?"
Make your choice!

11.13.2011

Did The Rabbi From Nazareth Start Christianity?

Firstly,as Paqid Yirmeyahu Ben-David of the Netzarim (R'anana,Israel),points out:

The critical point, absolutely essential to understanding these things, is this: you must stop the confusing of two polar opposites as if they are one and the same person—or the same teaching. Otherwise, all contradictions are glossed over by deferring them to an impossible oxymoron of two mutually exclusive and self-contradicting, polar-opposite arch-enemies, assuming a non-existent transition and a co-exist of intractable self-contradictions in "Jesus." (This is what allows Christians to claim "Jewishness" of "Jesus" and still identify with Christianity because, no matter how contradictory that may be, they ignore all contradictions, claiming they're still following "Jesus.")

When a Christian or Jew speaks of the post-135 C.E. Christian figures and events, you must recognize that these can only be figures and events associated with the Roman-Hellenist idol Jesus—regardless if (s)he calls it by a Hebrew name. You can call an onion a rose, but an onion by any other name… No meaningful communication can occur until you insist on consistent definitions free of intrinsic contradictions that, otherwise, propagate through any discussion.

meaning: Yehoshua,Yeshua,etc does NOT equal Jesus,or the Yeshu spoken about the in the Talmud.

*by that time,any memory of "The real Rabbi From Nazareth" had long been lost to history.

 btw: the Netzarim were Jews,NOT christians. cf: Eusebius -be aware,though that the church(maybe deliberately!)mixed up the term "Nazarenes."


It is a common belief amongst Christians that "The Rabbi From  Nazareth" started Xty.
 
No surprise there since:

  • "Christianity is an assumed faith."
  • The Hellenist-Roman church,c. 135 C.E.-present,Hegesippus and other 'writers' fabricated that 'history.'
This is a common belief among Jews also(there are many reasons for this),but suffice to say that Jews assume all their information about Xty from Xtn sources and direct contacts.

Using that kind of  faulty logic ,ex falso quodlibet dictates that one might just as well say that the Pope started Judaism!Disgusting,yes,but "touché" as they say in French.

The Netzarim challenge:

DOCUMENT where Orthodox Jews,suddenly overnight,woke up as 'Hellenist-Roman Xtns?"

What did Ribi Yehoshua say that shows he was a Pharisee Rabbi and that he and his disciples only knew Torah ("Netzarim [-an offshoot of the P'rushim[Pharisees]]")Judaism?

Netzarim Hebrew Matitiyahu(hellenized to "Matthew.")5:17-20:

“I didn’t come to subtract from the Torah  or the Neviim, nor to add onto the Torah  did I come. Because, rather, I came to [bring about the] complete [i.e., non-selective] observance of them in truth.


Should the heavens and the land of Israel exchange places, still, not even one י or one  of the Oral Laws of the Torah  shall so much as exchange places; toward the time when it becomes that they are all being performed — i.e., non- selectively – in full.

For whoever deletes one [point of] the Oral law of these directives from Torah, or shall teach others such, [by those in] the Realm of the heavens he shall be called ‘deleted.’ And whoever ratifies and teaches them shall be called ‘ Ribi’ in the Realm of the heavens.

 For I tell you that unless your tzedaqah [”righteousness”] is over and above that of the [Hellenist-Roman Pseudo- Tzedoqim] Codifiers of halakhah, and of the [probably Herodian-Boethusian] Perushim sect of Judaism, no way will you enter into the Realm of the heavens.”

[cf. Devarim 13:2-6 for the reason. ]


ie: what was the penalty for saying, 'the Law is done away with" or ,declaring oneself 'the son of g-d?'


Then again:

NHM 10  -you have "The Rabbi From Natzrat(hellenized to : "Nazareth.") sending his Talmidim out and giving them "minui over Rukhot" or, "authority over unclean spirits."

(look up  chapter 10 in any 'Gospel of Matthew' from the Greek(not the same,as "The Netzarim Reconstruction of Hebrew Matitiyahu", btw.)

  • You can't give out 'authority' you don't already have,so we know from this and other verses that 'Ribi Yehoshua' was a P'rushi('Pharisee' from Greek: "Pharisaos")Ribi("Rabbi") who would have had his s'michah('ordination')from Gamaliel and that he sat on the Beit Din in the Beit HaMikdash HaSheni(hellenized to 'The Second Temple.").

  • He tells his disciples that he is called only to "The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel(the xlation should be "those led astray from....")" and to go only to them and not to "Samaria(Heb: 'Shomron")"...
  • what were they led astray from? -100%,non-selective Torah observance!
  • what were they led astray to: Hellenization -assimlation,linguistically and otherwise into Greco-Roman culture!

Even the late Rabbi Jacob Emden said that he believed that Ribi Yehoshua and his Talmidim were Torah-Observant Jews....right til the end!

This can also be shown from the writings of Eusebius,Josephus and others.

ie:In that the "Netzarim" survived until 333 C.E. when,sadly,they were completely and finally eradicated by Constantine -yet -Eusebius testifies that 'they only accepted the Tanakh and their own ["Netzarim"]Hebrew Matitiyahu(which all the early church fathers said they possessed!),rejected the heavily,Gentile redacted N.T.,considered Saul/Paul,an apostate from Torah and rejected his writings.

The Greek N.T. manuscripts have thousands of variations and can clearly be shown to be derived from 'Roman Syncretisms' and "corrupted stories' passed down by "Hellenized Jews."One must,then realize that the N.T. is a 'book' [back] editted over thousands of years!

In order to keep this article short,go here for details:

http://www.netzarim.co.il

10.04.2011

Who Was The Rabbi From Nazareth?

A lot of people wonder about this....but first of all,LOGIC dictates that we eliminate the ILLOGICAL.

In other words,let's get it straight as to who THE Rabbi From Nazareth was not:

  1. In Netzarim Hebrew Matitiyahu 5:17,18  Ribi Yehoshua(Aramaic: Yeshua) stated:"Don't think that I came to uproot the Torah,or the Neviim(Prophets),but rather I came to reconcile them with the Oral Law of emet." after which he stated: 'Should the Heavens and Ha Aretz exchange places,still.not even  one Yud,nor one Tittle of the Oral Law of Mosheh shall so much as exchange places;until it shall become that it is all being fully ratified and being performed non-selectively....".
  2. According to Devarim 13:2-6(hellenized to "Deuteronomy"),ANYONE who changes Hashem's commandments would be declared a False Prophet,the penalty for which was immediate stoning!
  3. THEREFORE,he couldn't have declared "the Law is done away with(that's not even in the NT!)" and neither could he have declared himself to be "the son of G-d(much less "Hashem",himself)",or allow anyone else to declare him as such -AND accept it!That would've been IDOLATRY!
  4. Ribi Yehoshua is also NOT the "Issa" of the Qu'ran who will come back to wipe out all nations in the name of Islam - but that is way beyond the scope of this article.
One important point to realize is that as stated by Paqid Yirmeyahu Ben-David Ha Tzaddik of The Netzarim in R'anana,Israel(the ONLY Netzarim group in the world accredited with the Orthodox beit Din in their area and the ONLY group that EXCLUSIVELY follows ORTHODOX JUDAISM and nothing else!):

The critical point, absolutely essential to understanding these things, is this: you must stop the confusing of two polar opposites as if they are one and the same person—or the same teaching. Otherwise, all contradictions are glossed over by deferring them to an impossible oxymoron of two mutually exclusive and self-contradicting, polar-opposite arch-enemies, assuming a non-existent transition and a co-exist of intractable self-contradictions in Jesus." (This is what allows Christians to claim "Jewishness" of "Jesus" and still identify with Christianity because, no matter how contradictory that may be, they ignore all contradictions, claiming they're still following "Jesus.").

To put it another way:

Ribi Yehoshua(Yeshua) DOES NOT = J-E-S-U-S!

As Paqid Yirmeyahu Ben-David also stated(historically verified)[paraphrased]:

"There is no historical connection between the post 135 C.E,4th century Hellenist-Roman  counterfeit man g-d image "Yeshu" created by the church and the real first century Rabbi From Natzrat(pop: "Nazareth" from the Greek) "Ribi Yehoshua(Aramaic: Yeshua)"."

It was also pointed out that all the references in the Talmud in regards to Rabbis polemically speaking out against "Yeshu" are in reference to the man g-d figure the church was portraying,NOT to the historical person,who had long been forgotten and whose 'accounts' had long been well corrupted via Roman Syncretisms and corrupted stories passed down by Hellenized Jews -in GREEK.

Since the 1st century events of BCE 007.05.29(his astronomically/computer calculated birthdate) up to his death at the hands of the Pseudo-Tzedokim and the Romans c. 30 CE,took place within the religious and cultural context of  Judaism,it is within that 'framework' that the events must be viewed!

ie:You can't look at The Russian Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 from the point of view of The French Revolution of 1789–1799 -in another language."Context is key",somebody once said.

That means: Torah,Tanakh,Orthodox and Pharisee/Netzarim Judaism and Hallachah -in Hebrew(and/or Aramaic,a closely related sister language),NOT Greek and its Hellenist -Roman pagan culture and perspective!

After having done that,it will be discovered that the Christian Church(aka: the Hellenist-Roman Church) changed the story to suit its own ends and many contradictions come to light.ie: Christianity and all of its doctrines,symbols,its 'messiah',etc did NOT come from Judaism.Upsurpation,stealing and twisting Judaism's Bible and Ribi Yehoshua's sayings,life highlights and character would be a valid charge,though.

In NHM chapter 1,Ribi Yehoshua's historical Yukhasin(genealogical) record is found (along with Ky-Lu 3:23,which scholars believe was all part of the same record,originally.),which despite claims to fakery,is accurate as well as being the ONLY surviving record from the House of David!

NHM 2:1 states: "When Yehoshua was born in Beit-Lekhem ,Yehudah,Israel in the days of melekh Herod the Great..."

Scholars agree that Herod The Great lived from around 73 BCE to c. 4 BCE.It is also known that according to astronomical,computer data and other information,Yehoshua was born 007.05.29 BCE.

Where did live and minister from?:

NHM 4:13: "Having left Natzrat(pop:Nazareth),having come,he dwelled in K'far Nakhum (pop: Capernaum)."

In reading NHM chapters 3-5 and following accounts it can be clearly seen from his discourses that he was a Jew and in chapter 8 when 'a Captain in the Roman Army' came to him for help because his servant was sick,he not only calls him "Adoni(My lord,or sir")",but pays him great honour and respect,thereby showing not only himself to be either a Jew,or Geir,but that Ribi Yehoshua ws obviously a Rabbi.

In NHM chapter10 he gives his Talmidim 'minui  over rukhot of tamei' and tells  to care for all kinds of diseases and sickesses.

In reading the account of his sending them forth to 'those led astray from The House of Israel(he told them he was only called thusly and that they weren't to go to "Shomron(Samaria)")',it is obvious that he was a Rabbi,because no one can delegate 'authority' they don't already have.He would have received his S'michah from Gamliel.

*compared to the standard Greek 'Gospel of Matthew' ,it is obvious he is sending his disciples out to call Jews back to '100% non-selective Torah observance' and to establish Batei-Dins and 'Synagogues(Batei-Knesset)" NOT Christianity and churches!Nor was he making 'christians".In fact,since Eusebius stated that 'Christianity started in 135 CE when the Romans DEPOSED the 15th Netzarim Jewish Paqid Yehudah HaTzaddik.....",in 29 CE,when the above events took place,nobody would have even heard of Xty!

In fact,one of the Netzarim challenges in the book "Who Are the Netzarim" is (paraphrased): "DOCUMENT where and when Orthodox Jews went to sleep one night and woke up as sun-g-d worshipping christians the next morning?"

The truth is: Christianity is an assumed faith,just like 'the theory of evolution.'It takes more faith to believe in Evolution,than it does to believe in Creation Science and,simarly,nobody questions the NT they're reading -and yet -there is NO manscript evidence preceding the 2nd century,but a lot of historical evidence by Eusebius,Josphephus,Jerome and others that help us to piece together a VERY DIFFERENT account than the "Ecclestiastical Spin" that the western world has bought for over 2,000 years!

8.18.2011

The Real Davinci Code

Are you familiar with "The Davinci Code?"

 If not,then I'll give you a brief rundown:

Basically,the idea is that the Merovingian Bloodline are the descendants of J-e-s-u-s C-h-r-i-s-t and Mary Magdalene and the Roman Catholic Church is hiding the truth.

Well...it's even more twisted than that!

It's more like,the bad guys have broken into your house and you've hid your family in the Basement,so you draw their attention to somewhere else,ie: by priming the Hall Closet with a bunch of junk you know is going to fall and create a lot of noise,so as to divert their attention away from what you don;t want them to see!

This is what the Church has done....

What I'm about to divulge to you is information that:

  • The Roman Catholic Church,aka The Vatican,Papal Rome,etc doesn't want you to know.
  • Your Pastor,or Minister would just as soon you not question Christian history and the NT
  •  Your Rabbi definitely doesn't want you to know this...."it's not important"...ah,but it is,because the best way to deal with Christianity is to cut it off at the root,ie: prove its claims false.In order to do that,the facts must be known.
A hint: "Christianity is an assumed faith -by Christians,in particular and to make matters worse Jews assume all their information about it from either Christian sources,or direct contact with Christian 'missionaries.'

Here's the secret they don't want you to know:
  1. The REAL "Rabbi from Nazareth" was a P'rushi('Pharisee') 'Ribi" named "Yehoshua",or "Yeshua" in Aramaic....There is no historical correlation/connection between this Orthodox Jewish Rabbi and the post 135 C.E.,4th century Hellenist/Roman counterfeit man-g_d image "Yeshu" set up by the Roman Church.
  2. The earliest extant Church historian, Eusebius (260-340 CE), recorded in his Ecclesiastical History (EH II.xxiii.4) that the "charge" over the original Jewish followers of Ribi Yәhoshua had been given over to his brother, the first Nәtzarim Paqid, Ya·aqov "ha-Tzadiq" Ben-David (Hellenized to "James the Just"). 
  1. The earliest extant Church historian, Eusebius also documented that the Nәtzarim excised Saul, thereafter referred to exclusively as Paul, judging him an apostate (EH III.xxvii.4; see also NT corroboration in Ma·avar 15.41 with note 15.41.0 of Appendix V in Atonement In the Biblical 'New Covenant' (ABNC). 
  2. The earliest extant Church historian, Eusebius further documented (EH IV.vi.3-4) that, in 135 CE, the Roman gentiles displaced the Nәtzarim by their expulsion ("ethnic cleansing") from Yәrushalayim of every Jew… which included the 15th Nәtzarim Paqid (EH IV.v.1-4) whom the Romans displaced with the first gentile "bishop," Marcus (EH V.xii.1) — the birth of the gentile Roman Church in 135 CE!!! 
  3. The earliest extant Church historian, Eusebius further documented (EH III.xxvii.4-6) that the original Nәtzarim accepted only the Jewish Tana"kh as Bible and only The Netzarim ("their own") Hebrew Matityahu (NHM) as an authentic account of the life and teachings of Ribi Yәhoshua, never accepting the the 2nd-4th century, heavily gentile-redacted (Greek), NT. 
  4. Oxford historian James Parkes documented (The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue) how the central misojudaic (Judaic-hating) displacement theology of the original (post-135 C.E.) Church drove the Hellenist Roman Christians to ally with the Hellenist Roman Empire in persecuting the original Nәtzarim ("Nazarenes"). The original Church insisted that the Nәtzarim were "superseded" (displaced) by the Church and, because they defied the Church's rejection ("supercession") of Torah, the Nәtzarim had become enemies of the Church and, therefore, servants of Satan – who should no longer exist. This cooperation between the earliest Christian Church, who were Hellenist Romans, and the Hellenist Roman Empire in the persecution of the Nәtzarim Jews continued until Constantine eradicated the last remnant of the Nәtzarim in 333 CE. Parkes further demonstrated that 4th-century gentile Hellenist – misojudaic – Christianity was the polar antithesis of Judaic Ribi Yәhoshua of Nazareth and his original Judaic Nәtzarim disciples.
Now before you get over the shock of all the above,I have to give you another shock,because I left one important point out.

In 34 C.E,the Hellenist Jews,who would eventually come to be know as "Evionim" in Hebrew,"Ebionaoi" in Greek,and Ebionites in English,fled to Pella  after the stoning of the apostate Greek speaking Jew,Stephanos("Stephen").This is about the same time,the apostate Greek speaking Jew,Saul of Tarsus,later known as Paul,turns up!

(Forget the flowery stories about him and Paul you've read in the book of Acts.The NT is heavily redacted and doctored by 'loyal' 'translators' in order to sell the church's 'program' and anti-Jewish version of history!)

How can you prove this -without having access to the historical documents mentioned above?

  1.  Go to http://www.netzarim.co.il -all the historically verified information is already there.
  2.  Start reading the Tanakh (esp. the Torah),in Hebrew,NOT English.There is reason for this!
  3. Get underneath the Greek and refer to the Hebrew and Aramaic used in the 1st century
  4. Reconstruct 1st century Judaism and use Torah,Tanakh,Hebrew,Aramaic and Logic to recover the real history of events.
If you'll just stop assuming everything and start doing some critical analysis,you'll discover that none of Christianity's doctrine even come from the NT and in fact,the "NT" doesn't agree with the  "OT."

Take out your Christian Bible and read Matthew 5:17,18 -EVERY word,then think about it.Then read Devarim/Deuteronomy 13:2-6....6:4 "The Shema."
















8.13.2011

Daniel's 4th Beast and the 10 Horns

One of the things I've been having to do the last year,is totally relearn bible prophecy[and just about thing else for that matter!],because of all the faulty Xtn interpretations(some pretty wild ones at that) I had learnt over the years because of a wrong non-Judaic perspective....

[In fact,I heard that the Jesuits wrote all the 'future prophetic interpretations' to counteract the Protestant Movement's success against Papal Rome and their pointing the finger at the Pope as The Anti-C-h-r-i-s-t...and that's all I'd better say about that on this blog.]

...One being,יְחֶזְקֵאל‎‎ 38,39 ,meaning that the words  'רֹאשׁ','מֶשֶׁךְ' and 'תֻבָל' - do NOT mean,etymologically: Moscow,Russia,and Tubolsk,etc.as one popular,biblically-illiterate weekly Tv Evangelist likes to say(for the record:I don't watch ,or listen to any Xtn programs any more).ie:Russia and its Muslim satellite nations being the bad boy of this popular,erroneous interpretation.A recent  פָּרָשָׁה  on the Netzarim website dealt with this.

In fact,I found one Jewish Orthodox site,where they detail how they did a search to find that it appears that the land of Magog is actually an area overlapping Iran,Pakistan,Afghanistan and part of India, NOT Russia.

(this is the English xlation of the  עִבְרִית article.The website is in עִבְרִית. )

Another site detailed the fact that יְחֶזְקֵאל knew exactly what nations he was referring to,because the list is in  בְּרֵאשִׁית 10


This week I have been studying NHM 24 and although I read the notes the first time I got NHM,I must've missed this ,because after reading NHM 24 and its  notes again,I realized that the 10(and 11th)horns are not some fanciful future prophetic interpretation,but happened immediately post-135 C.E and is the fulfillment of (Daniel)דָּנִיֵּאל 7:25,particularly,in the person of Narcissus,and eventually Constantine.I can also see now how thanks to heavily redacted NT versions,the message really got perverted!

Most Bible prophecy buffs agree on the 4 beasts of   דָּנִיֵּאל  2  and 7,but do not go not as far as the last church I was in[The Seventh Day Adventist Church] (who still don't go as far as the נְצָרִים did and do!),which is probably why these days the Protestant and Orthodox churches are falling for Papal Rome's charms and their 'come home to Mother" message,as well as erroneously mistaking 'the 10 horns' as 10 Roman nations(after the breakup of the Roman Empire) and 3 were defeated(because of Arianism-shows the church didn't tolerate any dissent!)EU,10 Worldwide Trading Divisions,ad nauseam....I would guess you've probably heard 'em all.

Anyway....

Interestingly,this reminds me of how The Seventh Day Adventist Church(who love bible prophecy,especially דָּנִיֵּאל),referred to Daniel's 4th Beast" by the fact that Pagan-Rome gave birth to Papal Rome and refer to them as 'The Beast Power" and "Daniel's Little Horn(if I recall rightly they were referring to Constantine and the succession of Popes here ie:  'Usurpation' et al.},"and while it is wonderful that they go further than others do,in adding another piece of the prophetic jigsaw puzzle and calling it "The Anti-C-h-r-i-s-t System" ,because everything it teaches goes against scripture,and calling the Pope-"The Anti-C-h-r-i-s-t",being on the inside of Xty,they didn't and don't realize, as the  נְצָרִים did and do ,that actually the term should be more like 'The Anti-Messiah Power",because it's all Xty,and its set up "messianic man g_d image figure" and  is a usurpation,perversion and corruption of נְצָרִים יהדות and and  "רבי יהושע" and teaches the opposite of  יהודות   .

 They also,contrary to popular interpretations, ie:" all the world will be  chipped,''"the UPC Bar Code,"etc, refer to '666' being the number of "The Pope ",and in a way,they were on the right track,just didn't think it through enough ,maybe,to realize that as you pointed out on the website,it refers to an idolatrous sun g-d worship system which would take over -the product of an egg laying Dragon.


At least now,I don't have to worry about being 'left behind'!

Now to NHM 25....

7.17.2011

Christianity Is An Assumed Faith

Christianity is an assumed faith!This article is written with Christians in mind,so if you are  Jewish,you can pretty much disregard what I wrote below.Just be aware that all information that Jews have about Christianity comes from Christian sources,which is just 'assumed' to be correct -it isn't!

Hard to believe?

Examine the evidence.

The first point below is assumed by Christians AND Jews that:

  • Christianity was founded in the 1st century CE by J-e-s-u-s C-h-r-i-s-t. -it wasn't.
  • Christians assume that the Greek manuscripts all agree and there are only minor errors. -not true.
  • Christians assume that the NT agrees with the OT.-not true.
 *Jews don't refer to their Bible as  the "OT(a "Displacement Theology"term-invented by Marcion.)",they call it,the Tana''ch.
    Firstly, there is no historical connection between the post 135 C.E, 4th century Hellenist/Roman counterfeit man g_d image J-e-s-u-s and the 1st century P'rushi(Pharisee) pro Torah rabbi 'Ribi' Yehoshua(Aramaic: Yeshua).

    Secondly,Eusebius,the earliest extant church historian,wrote that Christianity began in 135 C.E,not before.

    Thirdly,since the earliest Greek NT mss(manuscript) is dated 200-299 C.E.,then the obvious answer is(since ONLY Judaism existed in the 1st century)that the NT manuscripts came from "Roman Syncretisms" and/or 'corrupted stories passed down by Hellenized Jews."

    There are several  ways one can prove this.....

    One being that Religious Jews and Hellenized Jews speaking of deity were not speaking the same words.The former's words came straight from Sinai,the latter's words straight from Greek mythology and the pagan temples.The other way is by comparing the Hebrew/Aramaic and Greek terms for the  same things.They don't mean the same!What's more,a search of Torah and Tanakh -in Hebrew,shows the above and in addition also exposes the false doctrines in the NT.

    Fourthly,Eusebius testified of the original Netzarim that:

    • they lived in the Jewish quarter alongside the Pharisees(the ancestors of the today's Orthodox Jews),amicably and Jews were forbidden according to Hallachah to have contact with non-Jews.
    • They only accepted the Tanakh,their own Hebrew Matitiyahu,rejected the heavily redacted Greek NT,considered Saul(Paul)an apostate and rejected his writings.
    • In 333,Constantine finally succeeded in completely eradicating them for refusing to compromize Torah,go to church on Sun-g-d-day("Constantine instituted rest on the venerable day of the sun("dies solis invicita")in 313 C.E. and anybody caught "judaizing" was punished.) and eat Pork on the way out.
    cf:
      The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue (chapters 1-5) by James Parkes(the late Oxford Historian).

      This excellent book is out of print,but may be found used somewhere online(I found a copy on Ebay),or in a bookstore somewhere.

      Take a typical Christian statement:

      "J-e-s-u-s died for our sins"

      1. Original Sin -There is no doctrine of Original Sin in Judaism.Kippur(Atonement) is already in Torah,so if you sin,you make Teshuvah(return,repent)and do better.The Doctrine of Orginal Sin comes from the Roman Church and was developed by Athanasius.
      2. Vicarious Atonment - 4th century Roman Church(look it up.I did) -again,atonement is already in Torah and earch man is responsible for his own sins.
      3. Savior -This goes against the Torah requirements for Mashiakh,namely he must keep Torah(or be disqualified according to Devarim 13:1-6).Mashiakh must also be a man and agent of Hashem,not some "man-g_d",or "demi-g-d."
      Other phrases like:

      "Man couldn't keep G-d's commandments,so G_d had to send His son",etc....is completely against Torah and Tanakh,and betrays its Hellenist/Roman pagan origin.Besides,look at the results of preaching this nonsense.You have people who claim to be Christians,living any old how expecting they're going to be in Heaven.

      "The Law is done away with" is not even in the NT(I'm not validating it,merely making a point.),but comes from Constantine/Papal Rome and fits perfectly with The Vatican's agenda,then and now towards the Jews.

      On another note:

      During WW2,"The Vatican Underground" as it was called,helped many Nazis escape to South America,Mexico and other places.The Vatican,according to one writer,also saved some Jews,so that in the event the Nazis lost,the Vatican could claim,they did what they could to save some Jews,and yet -they/the Jesuits were behind WW2(and all others!)anyway.

      btw: the word "law" is an accurate translation of the Greek word  νόμος ("nomos"),if you're referring to "the unalterable Athenian law" but it is NOT an accurate translation of the Hebrew word תורה ("Torah"),which should be either "Instruction",or "teaching."




        7.16.2011

        Jewish Tradition vs Christian Tradition


        When I say that word,I can hear Tevye from "Fiddler On The Roof" singing and shouting the word TRADITION,because everything was changing,ie: his daughter Tzeitel didn't want to marry Lazer Wolf the Butcher(really....can you blame her?She was only 20 and he was 75!!!),she wanted to marry Motel the tailor,her childhood sweetheart,but that wasn't how things were done,because marriages were supposed to be 'arranged" ,usually by the village matchmaker,the old Yenta- for a fee,of course!

        Anyway,there are good traditions and there are bad traditions.

        This is about a bad one.

        Just like Christianity is an assumed faith,Judaism has assumed some 'historical' and 'linguistic' traditions that are just plain not true,yet when one tries to point out the unadulterated facts(see below),there are Jews who willfully refuse to acknowledge these facts -all in the name of protecting Judaism from Christianty....by holding onto falsehoods?

        Are the Rabbis of Judaism today's "false Shepherds" spoken of by Yehezchel the Navi(prophet)(hellenized to "Ezekiel")?

        I think so!

        btw: all Jewish information(yes,including that on the Encyclopedia Judaica website) about Christianity comes from either Christian sources and/or contact with Christian missionaries(btw: "messianic" Jews are also Christians!)which is ALL assumed(to be true) and therefore invalid.

        In "Who Are The Netzarim " by Paqid Yirmeyahu Ben-David a few  of the "Netzarim Challenges" are:

        "Document,where these religious and Torah-observant Jews in the pre-135 CE Jewish community-as Dead Sea Scroll 4Q MMT describes the 1st century Jewish community-suddenly,and with no transition,or record of the event,abandoned their beit k'nesset and Torah teachings?"

        "Document where and when such strict Torâh-observant religious Jews turned 180° against their native religion overnight, with no record of any transition at all, to follow Hellenist Roman paganism? This requires a magical "Poof!" to explain – one night they all went to bed as Torâh-observant Jews and, "Poof!" they awoke the next morning as a gentile, pagan, misojudaic Church completely dependent upon Displacement Theology! "
        Here are the facts:


        "Jewish Tradition" has confused many Jews,namely in the following areas:

        1. נְצָרִים (Netzarim [Jews])נזיר(Nazir-Nazerite Vow) and נָצְרִים (Notzrim,Natzrim-Christians)come from 3 completely different roots,yet many blur 2 of them and some even all three,and worse,refuse to accept correction!Many are ignorant of the historical facts.ie: one church official stating "the Nazarenes" were keeping some of the church's 'beliefs"(while keeping some of their Jewish beliefs) is obviously NOT the נְצָרִים since Eusebius documented that they were eradicated by 333 CE for refusing to compromise Torah.Sounds like a twist on the early church's belief of "everybody's a heretic-except them",only in this case from a Jewish point of view: 'they're all Xtns!"
        The historical and linguistic facts disagree with Jewish Tradition.

        3)Another common misconception is that Xty started in ie: 20 CE by "J-e-s-u-s" and that believing in ANY 1st century messiah is XTY!

        Even the Talmud disagrees with that erroneous statement!

        4)J-e-s-u-s.... and רבי יהושע(Ribi[ONLY P'rushi/Pharisee Rabbis held that title!]Yehoshua) are the same person.

        Logically,not possible,since the two were/are vastly different in character.The first was an invention of the Hellenist/Roman post 135 C.E. church and is supposed to have 'done away with the law(that doctrine is not even in the heavily redacted NT-quite the opposite,in fact)" and the second,a 1st century Pro-Torah Pharisee rabbi(a man,no less) named "Yehoshua."

        Details here: http://www.netzarim.co.il

        From Christianity To Netzarim Judaism

        I was born in Maidstone,Kent,England in 1958 and experienced religion at an early age attending The Church of England,saying "The L_rd's Prayer" and singing Hymns at Primary School.

        I started taking French in school at age 7.This would turn to be significant later on.

        When I look back on it all now,I realize that like Avraham in Ur of the Chaldees,amongst all those idols,the one true Hashem(Devarim 4:6),the Perfect Singularity/Creator was calling out to him and He was also calling out to me and awakening in me a desire to know more of Him and leave the idols behind.Little,then did I realize what those idols were and are and even now,I'm only just beginning to thanks to Hebrew,Torah and the Netzarim!

        In April of 1966,my family emigrated to Canada,eventually 2 years later settling in Peterborough,Ontario,where I grew up and where I continued my spiritual search,mostly via ocassional and seasonal Church attendance.

        In Canada,in some areas our two official languages are spoken side by side.This was another positive influence for later on.Plus,TV and Radio have both present.

        One thing I wondered about was the fact that I had some fellow Jewish students at Elementary school and when we had religious studies,they were always exempt.This made me curious.I asked one of them about it and he explained that they weren't teaching the Tanakh the same way he was taught!They were twisting it,he told me. I took note of that,but having a zeal,but no knowledge,didn't quite know what to think,so I shelved it!

        One thing that happened during high school was in taking French my teacher instilled in me a gift for languages(Iwanted to drop it,but she begged me not to,telling me that "You know you like languages and have a gift for them") which would come in handy later on.I would develop an ear and a knack for picking up languages years later.

        In the Spring of 1978,I returned to England to live,getting involved in various Pentecostal groups,eventually,after it all made sense,finally giving up my life and becoming "born again."

        In the fall of 1981,back in Canada,I made a vow that I would never be a victim of somebody's Bible translations,because I would study the original languages for myself.

        After seeing an ad in a Toronto newspaper,where I was living at the time,I took a course in modern Hebrew,visited a "Messianic" Jewish Assembly,a Conservative Synagogue and talked to the many Jews I would encounter around the city.I bought a Hebrew Bible and I even read part of the Talmud once.I also bought myself some cassettes and began teaching myself modern Greek.There were questions I had to have answers to and I knew I was not going to find them in any translation.

        I was becoming aware of a number of conflicts,but couldn't sort them out at that time,not having the information I needed.For example,I observed that "Messianic" Judaism,as refreshing as it was,compared to the churches,was just a Christianity with Jewish clothing!

        I realized that to understand the true 1st century message,the events and names must be restored to their first century linguistic,cultural and religious context.

        In translating any language,it is said that at one end of the scale you have "literal translation(word for word)",at the other end is "figurative(loose translation)" and then there's the middle.The hard part is getting the thought form across.Often what happens in going from one lanaguage to another, only the words get translated and even then,they get twisted!I was becoming increasingly aware that Ribi Yehoshua's(Aramaic "Yeshua" NOT the post 135 C.E. 4th century Hellenist/Roman counterfeit man g_d image "J-e-s-u-s" invented by the Roman church!) original message had been changed and twisted thanks to the Greek.

        I remember watching a cartoon about Channukah once,where the candles were lit with Hebrew letters,but when the letters were changed to Greek,the lights went out,until the Greek letters were replaced with Hebrew ones again.This of course,was the Macabee story,but even so,it's common knowledge that Ribi Yehoshua and his Talmidim spoke Western Aramaic,NOT Greek.For Jews,their language whether Hebrew,Aramaic,Ladino,Yiddish,etc has preserved their identity and kept them together,but that's another story indeed!

        I began attending a Greek Evangelical church and looking into the Greek,as well as keeping my interest in Biblical Hebrew.I became aware though that despite the fact that Greek is more precise than English,it was not the language,or culture that the events of Ribi Yehoshua's day were conducted in.

        One conflict I had was:

        Why do Jews(and Seventh Day Adventists)worship on Shabbat("The Bible Sabbath"),but others on Sun-g_d-Day.People would tell me: "It doesn't matter...""The Torah is done away with..." I wondered:How can Hashem's law be changed....How did it get changed and how did this doctrine come about and if not from scripture where from?

        The answer I found out years later: "All roads lead to (Papal)Rome."Also,Constantine and the Popes.

        Many years later,I found out that Ribi Yehoshua and his Talmidim all kept Shabbat and their days were as Hashem had commanded: "...Sunset to Sunset..."...but man,namely Constantine and the Papal powers had changed Hashem's laws,namely Shabbat to Sun-g_d-day and Pope Gregory instituted the Julian Calendar,using the Babylonian/Roman reckoning of time with days beginning at midnight,again perverting Hashem's commands(Daniel 7:25).

        I spent 15 years with The Seventh Day Adventist Church;5 years watching and 10 years in it and comparing scripture with scripture,but discovered that while they had the truth of the Sabbath and the "the law",they didn't know the difference between a "righteous" person and a "sinner("we're all sinners....")" and they held to "Replacement Theology("the church has replaced Israel as the people of Hashem.")

        I now realize looking back that the Ruach HaQodesh was witnessing to my heart that these were a few of the many false doctrines.I also discovered that all the symbols in Christianity came from Papal Rome and theirs from Pagan sources.Afterall,it is said that the seat of the Babylonian religion was moved to Rome in 376 C.E.

        I also became increasingly aware that most Christians are just blindly following whatever doctrines their church believes,keeping their roster of "scriptural proofs" yet never opening their bibles to check anything out.And they say "Hashem has blinded the Jews!?" They need to look in their own mirror!

        All the churches come from their mother(Papal Rome) and the so-called Protestant Reformation wasn't much of a reformation at all,because despite the fact that their motto was 'Sola Scritura(Scripture Only)",they never made a clean break from the Roman church and none of their doctrines were/are from scripture.Prostestantism is just watered down Roman-Catholicism,as I see it now.

        I knew I had to come out of all the churches and got loosely involved with the "Hebrew Roots Movement" which is made up of people searching out their Hebrew roots and are all in various stages of coming out of the churches.As they see the Bible truths via the Hebrew and Aramaic,the Greco/Roman Mindset starts to crack and fall away!Unfortunately,the other side of the coin,the Messianic Movement is still basically Christianity(they won't admit that,of course).I realized I had to avoid picking up any more unbiblical junk!

        I realized,again,that if I wanted to know the truth,I had to start from Torah and put all 1st century events back in their Orthodox Jewish and Aramaic/Hebraic context.When I did,all the false idolatrous teachings I'd learned were quickly shown as false in the light of the Torah.

        Then in late 2009,via a websearch for "Who are the Netzarim?" I came across 'www.Netzarim.co.il" and the final piece of the Jigsaw Puzzle appeared.

        It explained what I had kind of known all along,that I had been the victim of 2000 years of Eclessiastical lies and Greek polution of the first century Rabbi's pro-Torah,Jewish message.

        In studying: "Who Are The Netzarim?" "Atonement In The Biblical New Convenant and "The Netzarim Reconstruction Of Hebrew Matitiyahu" ,I can see clearly how Ribi Yehoshua's message got perverted by Daniel's fourth Beast (Daniel 2),the egg laying Dragon of Pagan,then Papal Rome.

        Details here: http://www.netzarim.co.il