The real "Rabbi From Nazareth" was a P'rushi("Pharisee")Rabbi entitled " Ribi Yehoshua" who followed Judaism,prayed in a Beit Knesset and lived and taught EXCLUSIVELY in the Orthodox Jewish community -NOT in a Hellenist-Roman gentile church.
Firstly,it’s years since I wrote anything,so just let you know: I’m still here.
The title might be remembered by fans of Star Trek The Original Series where Mr. Spock drove everybody nuts with his logic.
But…
Torah IS logic.
The Hebrew language IS logic.
Four years ago,governments tried to implement a plandemic,all about control and their psychopathic desires for a one World Government;not the first time.
Today,Israel is fighting another Amalek,this time Hamas,who according to their charter will not stop until Israel and Jews cease to exist.
All is being revealed.
People are seeing Islam for what it really is: an ideology of conquest and hatred of everything non-Islamic(especially Jews and Israel) masquerading as a religion(of peace).
Christianity is pagan,an assumed faith that began in 135 CE.
Every doctrine,tenet and tradition came from pagan sources
*Constantine instituted rest on the venerable day of the Sun in 313 CE.
*E*ster is the Roman fertility godess festival (along with the Babylonian egg laying rabbit),brought onto the Church of Rome in 336 CE to bring more pagans and money into the church.
Same with Xmas and the other feasts,but….like Columbus discovering America in 1492(the Vikings were here first in 900 CE and somebody was there anyway),but the The Vartican controlled history and most are so brainwashed that they won’t listen and won’t research either,they just argue.
Judaism is true and the real rabbi from Nazareth taught Torah and lived and interacted in the Jewish community.
Tonight,I tried to watch this series of programs on CNN to see if I could learn something new to add to what I have learned over the years,through realizing that the Greek and Hebrew/Aramaic terms for some things appear to mean the same in English,but,at the root they don't,example:
"Christ" and "Mashiach."
Although they both mean "anointed one" in English,the latter refers exclusively to the messiah in Tanakh,while the former refers just like the name "Jesus(from Latin: "Iesus",Greek: "Isous",short form of "Iesous" "healer of Zeus"),refers to Greek pagan deities.
*Doesn't anybody wonder about the fact that when the Romans invaded Jerusalem and built their city Aelia Capitolina" on top of the ruins and erected their sun-deity image,they named after their deities,and the abbrevation is: "IHS" -it's on EVERY church banner -and it doesn't mean what they think it means!!!
The other problem is the fact that Eusebius,the early extant church historian(260-340 C.E.),stated in his Ecclesiastical History that The Rabbi From Nazareth was known by the title of Ribi Yehoshua,and.more that after his death,the charge over his Netzarim talmidim was given over to his brother "Ya'acov HaTzaddik",hellenized to "James The Just."
When you also realize that in Judaism,according to Devarim(hellenized to Deuteronomy)13:2-6,no Jew,especially a Rabbi would ever have said the Torah was done away with,much less declare himself "the son of G-d",you realize that any logically thinking scholar must ask the following questions:
What does Orthodox Judaism believe?
What is the Hebrew/Aramaic meaning of....?
What was the political situation?
What do later historians write?
Any there any documented clues in the regards to these first century events?
Is the New Testament(displacement theology term invented by Marcian!) genuine,or redacted?
Anyway...when the narrator reads the names on the ossuary,he keeps saying " James the brother of Jesus",I kept yelling "That's not what it says,dummy!You can't read!"It says: "Ya'acov Bar Yosef...."
I don't see anything wrong with Anglicization,but,it is always best to preserve the original language terms when dealing with certain subjects,but,one should also make sure that the Anglicized name DOES equal the linguistic term in that language.In this case,they don't!
This is what I mean by supposition. On all these programs,they have "professors",etc,from Christian backgrounds,rabbiting the same regurgitated stuff,never bothering to check their sources.
In other fields,if experts did this,they'd get themselves in a lot of trouble,but,in religion it's allowed,because like Columbus' discovery of America being pre dated by the Vikings,there's no sense changing history because nobody cares anyway,and,because "religion is big business(for Israel)" and money,support and votes count!
If you are old enough to remember watching Dragnet,that popular Crime Drama from way back in the 1950s-1970s,you'll remember that Sergeant Friday(Jack Webb) always opened the program with: "The story you are about to hear is true,but the names have been changed to protect the innocent...."
Well,the old Looney Tunes had a parody of Dragnet,with Daffy Duck playing "Detective Duck Drake",where he opens the cartoon with: "The story you are about to hear is true,but the names have been changed to protect the guilty(he raises his voice at this point and spits the italicized part out in contempt!)."
At this point,you must be thinking: "Well,how is the Church involved and how and where is the relationship between it and Dragnet?"
It's purely symbolic!
Firstly,Daffy Duck's line is closer to the truth(in this case),than the original Dragnet line,in that if I had entitled this article differently,it would have been:
Operation Ecclesiastical Cover up Exposed!
What better way to discredit the Jews as a people than to paint them as the bad guys and erase all evidence of their history,twist it,contaminate it and claim it as your own -knowing that::
you have the power in Europe;nobody would dare to challenge you,or they and their country will be 'under an edict','declared anathema[under a curse]' ,etc.
Keep the Bible only in Latin,chained to the pulpit
Make sure that the common people stay illiterate and unlearned ,so they can't read it
Make them too jaded and lazy to make the effort anyway
But.....there are always a few who will -because they have to know...for sure!
Some,well meaning 'Simpletons' consider it 'a lack of faith' to question
and look for evidence.Their motto is: "I believe the Bible and that's
good enough for me."That's a whole article in itself,so I don't time to
explore that one,but the truth is(especially in this day and age),all
the background material you can come up with,so much the better,and many people,especially educated people,will respect you a lot more.
To put it another way: Columbus discovered America in 1492...(the same year the Jews were kicked out of Spain....Is there a relationship there,or is that just coincidence?),or did he?
Firstly,how do you discover a land that already has somebody there[read about the Caribe and other Indians and what Columbus' Spanish Conquistadors did to them[mind you,all Indian tribes had a history of oppressing each other in the same way],and on top of all that,my question is how did Roman Catholicism fit into all this?
Archaeologists say the the Vikings were actually here first,as early as 900 C.E,but some people have so accepted the well taught account that they would say: "What's the point of changing all the history books?"
Of course,if history was like George Orwell's '1984',one would just go back and 'edit' the past articles to say anything they want. His job was to 'edit' past archives of the Newspaper to agree with whatever 'those in power' were saying at the time!
I remember back in the fall of 1981,or maybe it was early 1982,when I met this guy from Jews For Jesus on the street in downtown Toronto.What he said really got me thinking and realizing: "Aha!Now,I'm onto something,except,I don't know what,or how to go about finding it out..."
He said: 'You have to remember that we Jews have been the victims of nearly 2,000 years of Ecclesiastical history and bad Bible translations,and in any case,his name wasn't Jesus,it was Yeshua."
So,I realized that like any good Reporter,I was going to have to do some deep digging to get to the bottom of this story and Watergate had nothing on this one!
Over the years,I continued to listen to various "Messianic Jews(they're 'christians',not because they believe "The Rabbi From Nazareth" is the Mashiach,but because,like the Church,they deify him and add Xtn doctrines,such as 'original sin(invented by Athanasius of Alexandria,apparently)",and "Vicarious Atonement(ca. 200 C.E. plus)" -all Greek and pagan in their origin! )" explain and explore the "Jewish background" and "Jewish understanding" and Judaism" behind the 'story."
Each time,I came away with the thought "Something is wrong with this story and just isn't adding up!"
Suffice to say(as I found out 15 years later through The Seventh Day Adventist Church),there is nowhere in the N.T. where it says "the Law is done away with" and nowhere did "The Rabbi From Nazareth,his disciples,or Paul The Apostate,ever give any authorization for keeping Sun-g-d-day holy.
Where did they come from?
Constantine(cf. Daniel 7:25) and The Hellenist-Roman Church,aka Papal-Rome!
cf. Daniel chapter 2 and 7....re: Daniel's Fourth Beast -'an egg-laying Dragon.
In other words,Pagan Rome gave birth to,or morphed(changed shape and form,that is)into 'Papal Rome.'
Europe and the governments of the World,particularly,the western world ie:Europe,Canada,USA,Mexico,Central and South America,Australia and all the other former British Commonwealth Nations and the U.N. are the continuation and extension of that original pagan Roman Power ('Edom' ,'Esau')which would love to get rid of the Jews and Israel('Jacob') helped by Esau's descendents -Ishmael(the Arabs and Islam).
Witness the fact that it was the Emperor Hadrian who renamed the area of Judah/Judea and Samaria as 'Palestina."
Christianity started in 135 C.E.(not before)when the Romans deposed the 15th Netzarim Paqid Yehudah HaTzaddik and DISPLACED him with their own Roman gentile bishop 'Marcus' and thus began the mix of Babylonian/Egyptian/Greco/Roman pagan sun-g-d worship religion with Hellenized Judaism(Greek speaking Jews),the rise of the "Hellenist-Roman counterfeit man-g-d image" Jesus and the war against the Jews -which contines to this day.
In 1917,the Balfour Declaration,took land from the Ottoman Turks and doled it out to create the current Middle east map.Only 25% of that land was given to Israel,and yet,the U.N. and the other world powers(can you say 'Oil?'),since 1948 continuely press Israel into giving away land,which doesn't help because the Arabs('Palestinian' is a political label that never existed before 1948 -and the Arabs created that problem anyway)are never satisfied and have only one goal(like Hitler's): 'No more Jews,no more Israel,and Jerusalem -all ours!"
This weekend is Tisha B'Av -look it up and you'll find out that every major calamity from the destruction of the Beit HaMiqdash HaSheni(hellenized to 'Second Temple'),to the Second World War and the Shoah("Holocaust")...happened on the 9th of Av.
To make this article shorter and to get all the details of the real 1st-4th century history just go here:
Christians(and even many Jews) believe('assume' is a better word)that Christianity dates back to the first century,started by 'The Rabbi From Nazareth(now,that really makes sense.')'yet the facts prove otherwise.
Why is it that so few Christians consider how Christianity and Judaism are 180 degrees different?
Christianity claims descent from Judaism -is that true?Is there documented proof?
There are thousands of variations in the Greek New Testament manuscripts and fragments.In fact,according to The Interpreter's Dictionary Of The Bible,there are 30,000 plus variations in the Gospel of Luke alone!
There are no Greek(or Aramaic)N.T. manuscript sources pre-3rd century.
It was the early church father and heretic Marcion who invented the terms Old and New Testament,which obviously lent 'authority' to the Hellenist-Roman church's agenda towards the Jews,namely: "Displacement Theology.'ie:the church and its people have replaced the Jews as 'the people of G-d.'
Eusebius(260-340) documented (EH III.xxvii.4-6) that the original Netzarim accepted only the Jewish Tana"kh as Bible and only The Netzarim ("their own") Hebrew Matityahu (NHM) as an authentic account of the life and teachings of Ribi Yәhoshua, never accepting the 2nd-4th century, heavily gentile-redacted (Greek), NT.
There is no historical connection between the post 135 C.E.,2nd-4th century Hellenist-Roman counterfeit man-g-d image and the real first century Rabbi,who Eusebius says was known by the title of "Ribi Yehoshua",the 'Ribi' identifying him as a Pharisee Rabbi.
There was no "J' in any language until after 500 C.E..The name J-e-s-u-s and C-h-r-i-s-t both derive from Greek pagan terms rerferring to Greek Deities -which no self-respecting Jew would ever be associated with.
He also stated that the Netzarim excised Saul/Paul as an apostate from Torah and rejected his writings.
Eusebius said that Christianity began in 135 C.E. when the Romans deposed the 15th Netzarim Jewish Paqid,or leader,Yehudah HaTzaddik and displaced him with their own gentile Bishop Marcus...
He admits that the Pope fabricated a line of Popes going back to Peter(actually the church`s `Peter`doesn`t bare any resemblance to `Shimon Bar Yonah,aka: `Keifah`)...Not only that,but the Hellenist-Roman Church back-invented a first century history - which there is NO documentation for.
Just a little logic goes a long way.
For example,what was the makeup of first century Israel( the name 'Palestina' is post 135 C.E.)?
Its central theme was Judaism(of course,it wasn't called Judaism back then.That term came about much later)),which consisted of Torah,Tanakh ,etc in the Hebrew and Aramaic languages.
Therefore,one must look at first century events in the context that they took place in.When one does that,it will be quickly seen that many of Christianity's doctrines,things the N.T. quotes "The Rabbi From Nazareth" as saying,are heavily-redacted('back-editted')and just don't add up.
In fact,the truth is,not only was there no Christianity before 135 C.E.,but every Christian Symbol,Sign,Doctrine,Teaching,Belief -whatever can ONLY be traced to pagan sources,ie: Babylonian Religion,Egyptian Religion,Mthraism and other similar sources.
Which will it be for you?
Will it be:
Torah and Tanakh -or the N.T. and Displacement Theology?
Daniel's 4th Beast -Pagan/Papal Rome and its 'little horn power' Constantine who 'changed times and laws(meaning 'the Moedim[feasts] and Torah')' or Torah?
Ribi Yehoshua/Yeshua,or "J-e-s-u-s/Yeshu?"
Passover,or the Roman Fertility g-ddess festival of E-a-s-t-e-r?
Hannuchah" or the Norse/Roman festivals that eventually became known as "C-h-r-i-s-t-m-a-s?"
Christianity is an assumed faith!This article is written with Christians in mind,so if you are Jewish,you can pretty much disregard what I wrote below.Just be aware that all information that Jews have about Christianity comes from Christian sources,which is just 'assumed' to be correct -it isn't!
Hard to believe?
Examine the evidence.
The first point below is assumed by Christians AND Jews that:
Christianity was founded in the 1st century CE by J-e-s-u-s C-h-r-i-s-t. -it wasn't.
Christians assume that the Greek manuscripts all agree and there are only minor errors. -not true.
Christians assume that the NT agrees with the OT.-not true.
*Jews don't refer to their Bible as the "OT(a "Displacement Theology"term-invented by Marcion.)",they call it,the Tana''ch.
Firstly, there is no historical connection between the post 135 C.E, 4th century Hellenist/Roman counterfeit man g_d image J-e-s-u-s and the 1st century P'rushi(Pharisee) pro Torah rabbi 'Ribi' Yehoshua(Aramaic: Yeshua).
Thirdly,since the earliest Greek NT mss(manuscript) is dated 200-299 C.E.,then the obvious answer is(since ONLY Judaism existed in the 1st century)that the NT manuscripts came from "Roman Syncretisms" and/or 'corrupted stories passed down by Hellenized Jews."
There are several ways one can prove this.....
One being that Religious Jews and Hellenized Jews speaking of deity were not speaking the same words.The former's words came straight from Sinai,the latter's words straight from Greek mythology and the pagan temples.The other way is by comparing the Hebrew/Aramaic and Greek terms for the same things.They don't mean the same!What's more,a search of Torah and Tanakh -in Hebrew,shows the above and in addition also exposes the false doctrines in the NT.
Fourthly,Eusebius testified of the original Netzarim that:
they lived in the Jewish quarter alongside the Pharisees(the ancestors of the today's Orthodox Jews),amicably and Jews were forbidden according to Hallachah to have contact with non-Jews.
They only accepted the Tanakh,their own Hebrew Matitiyahu,rejected the heavily redacted Greek NT,considered Saul(Paul)an apostate and rejected his writings.
In 333,Constantine finally succeeded in completely eradicating them for refusing to compromize Torah,go to church on Sun-g-d-day("Constantine instituted rest on the venerable day of the sun("dies solis invicita")in 313 C.E. and anybody caught "judaizing" was punished.) and eat Pork on the way out.
This excellent book is out of print,but may be found used somewhere online(I found a copy on Ebay),or in a bookstore somewhere.
Take a typical Christian statement:
"J-e-s-u-s died for our sins"
Original Sin -There is no doctrine of Original Sin in Judaism.Kippur(Atonement) is already in Torah,so if you sin,you make Teshuvah(return,repent)and do better.The Doctrine of Orginal Sin comes from the Roman Church and was developed by Athanasius.
Vicarious Atonment - 4th century Roman Church(look it up.I did) -again,atonement is already in Torah and earch man is responsible for his own sins.
Savior -This goes against the Torah requirements for Mashiakh,namely he must keep Torah(or be disqualified according to Devarim 13:1-6).Mashiakh must also be a man and agent of Hashem,not some "man-g_d",or "demi-g-d."
Other phrases like:
"Man couldn't keep G-d's commandments,so G_d had to send His son",etc....is completely against Torah and Tanakh,and betrays its Hellenist/Roman pagan origin.Besides,look at the results of preaching this nonsense.You have people who claim to be Christians,living any old how expecting they're going to be in Heaven.
"The Law is done away with" is not even in the NT(I'm not validating it,merely making a point.),but comes from Constantine/Papal Rome and fits perfectly with The Vatican's agenda,then and now towards the Jews.
On another note:
During WW2,"The Vatican Underground" as it was called,helped many Nazis escape to South America,Mexico and other places.The Vatican,according to one writer,also saved some Jews,so that in the event the Nazis lost,the Vatican could claim,they did what they could to save some Jews,and yet -they/the Jesuits were behind WW2(and all others!)anyway.
btw: the word "law" is an accurate translation of the Greek word νόμος ("nomos"),if you're referring to "the unalterable Athenian law" but it is NOT an accurate translation of the Hebrew word תורה ("Torah"),which should be either "Instruction",or "teaching."
